180 K+
Active Users
Whether it’s one essay or a full class set, this AI checker for teachers fits right between reading and grading, with no installation needed.
Paste the student’s text or upload a PDF, DOCX, or TXT file. There’s no need to copy text out of a document; the whole file is checked.
Upload student submissions one document at a time (DOC, DOCX, PDF, or TXT files up to 10 MB) and see which drafts need a closer look before you start grading.
See which passages read as AI-written and which as the student’s own. Compare them with earlier drafts or past work before you decide what to do next.
180 K+
Active Users
900 K+
School Assignments Evaluated
1,200+
Daily New Documents
AI tools now show up in student writing in many forms: an outline, a reworded paragraph, a complete draft. According to the 2026 Student Generative AI Survey by the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI), 95% of UK undergraduates report using AI in at least one way, while 94% have used generative AI to help with assessed work.What Teachers Say About Our AI Checker
When a submission feels off, you get a quick check and something concrete to discuss:
Wrongly flagging a student is a real risk. A false-positive rate of under 1% keeps that risk low, so your conversations start from evidence.
A mostly original essay can still contain AI-written passages. Seeing the mix lets you give feedback on the student’s own writing and discuss the rest.
With 100+ submissions a week, close reading for AI isn’t realistic. Run a quick check first and spend your time on the work that needs it.
Download a detailed PDF report with the flagged sections highlighted, so a student or coordinator sees exactly what you saw.
Yes, with a free account you can check up to 3,000 characters with 1 free check per day. Paid options - including the 7-Day Trial ($2.00, then $39.99/month) and the Unlimited Annual plan ($95.88/year) - add unlimited daily scans, detailed sentence-level PDF exports, and 10 MB document uploads.
Any detector can. Ours is specifically calibrated for non-native English (ESL) writers to keep false positives under 1%. If an ESL student is flagged, compare with their earlier work before you decide.
Treat AI results as indicators, not final proof. A flag means the text has patterns worth a closer look, not that AI was definitely used.
In testing, it detected 98%+ of AI-generated text from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini (based on multi-model benchmark testing), with a false-positive rate of under 1%. No detector is perfect, so review results alongside drafts, revision history, and your own judgment.
Essays, reports, discussion posts… pretty much anything with enough text to analyze. Longer, structured responses give the detector more to work with. Very short answers under 50 words may not give a clear result.
Not on its own. Most educators treat it as one piece of the puzzle. It can raise a flag, but confirming misconduct usually involves more: a plagiarism checker, earlier drafts, or even just asking the student a few direct questions about what they wrote.
Most checks finish in 15–20 seconds. Longer documents like research papers may take 1 to 3 minutes.
Student work isn’t used to train AI models and is encrypted during processing. Files are stored securely for as long as your account remains active, and you can delete your files and scan history at any time directly from your dashboard.
Detection alone doesn’t prevent misuse. Explaining up front that work will be checked, and why, can make students more open about how they used AI.